Hi Warren,
On , Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee <[email protected]>
wrote:
Does it mean that you want to only go with solution to change DNS
protocol?
You don't want to put any other solution in agenda which doesn't
change much
the DNS protocol such as cga-tsige. The might be more examples.
The CGA-TSIG document itself seems to have been shopped around a large
amount, starting in 2012 -- I see it being pushed in IntArea, SAAG,
DANE, DNSOP, DNSEXT and DPRIVE.
It has been discussed in DPRIVE, but I did not get the sense that the
WG had interest in pursuing it. There were some questions / confusion
about what exactly it provides / how it works.
You did request agenda time in Dallas - we only requested a 90 minute
slot, and so can only give you 10 minutes to present and answer
questions - if the WG shows support after that we can discuss adopting
this as well....
W
I am going to do another revision before cut off date. Please allocate
this 10 mins to this draft (hopefully this is enough). I will use this
time only to cover questions rather than explaining the detail idea.
Thank you,
Best,
Hosnieh
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
