Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com): > Can I hope that it won't append a Reply-To: header if there is already one?
I really have no idea. Mailman's versions of the last few years have, if as listadmin you have the poor judgement to enforce Reply-To munging via the admin WebUI, done that forcing _additively_, appending the forced header to any existing one supplied by the sender (e.g., as a second Reply-to addressee, comma-delimited). So, I suspect the ones added for DMARC mitigation would do likewise. If you wish the answer to that specific question, maybe you should ask the GNU Mailman developers. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
