On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 00:34:09 -0800 Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Are you in the middle of submitting a patch to GNU Mailman, then? I'm > expect they will give it appropriate consideration, and give you > expert feedback (which, possibly, the rest of us will appreciate > hearing). > > OTOH, expecting Dyne.org people to hand-hack the local Mailman > installation, rather than trying to get it accepted by the > developers, and not even providing anyone with a patch, doesn't > strike me as even a tiny bit reasonable. And, gosh, I'm sorry to say > you appear to be so suggesting, which again, for the second night in > a row, makes me a little sad. In my wildest imagination, I never dreamed that Mailman wouldn't give the admin control over the text assembly of the munged from. If Mailman gives this string as a take-it-or-leave-it constant, I guess I'll just have to implement a fix on my end. Anyone know of an equivalent for procmail on the *sending* side? SteveT Steve Litt December 2019 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
