On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, John Hughes wrote: > > Then I believe we also agree that rc.local is a serious regressions? > > What regression?
the fact that besides creating it and making it executable, one must also activate the service unit. > > In Debian right now I don't even see a debate, > > A debate about what? Whether rc.local should be run? Whoever said it > shouldn't be? Or that it won't be in the future? I am afraid that is not enough to create /etc/rc.local to have it ran by default. just afraid, not checked enough, hence asking > Rumors. From some of the least reliable tech sites on the web > (stackoverflow! Ack Pfft!). Did you see any of these "rumors" on > an actual Debian site or mailing list? no, the "rumors" I refer to are, as I said, coming from an upstream project whose CI has broken. I'm glad we also have an important take away for Devuan as Katolaz points out: to mark the initscripts package as important. ciao _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
