I already guesed it. I added the comment in the same line because i was testing a netman.postrm file in order to remove the line added by netman in /etc/network/interfaces when the package is uninstalled. But perhaps it is not necessary. After that, i forgot to remove the comment.
Thanks. Aitor. On 24/09/15 07:45, Edward Bartolo wrote: > Hi Aitor, > > fsmithred found that /etc/network/interfaces should not contain > partially commented lines. Please make sure comments are whole lines. > > Edward > > On 23/09/2015, tilt! <t...@linuxfoo.de> wrote: >> > My bad, thanks for explaining - perfectly fine of course. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > T. >> > >> > Am 23.09.2015 um 20:57 schrieb aitor_czr: >>> >> Hi Tilt, >>> >> >>> >> I was referring to a branch into the netman project in Git, including >>> >> three branches: >>> >> >>> >> 1.- Upstream branch >>> >> 2.- Debian branch >>> >> 3.- Pristine-tar branch >>> >> >>> >> Being a branch in Git, the name is not confusing. See here: >>> >> >>> >> https://gitlab.com/aitor_cz/linux-libre/tree/gbp-master >>> >> >>> >> Aitor. >>> >> >>> >> On 07/04/21 23:21, aitor_czr wrote: >>>> >>> Good idea :-) >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 22/09/15 11:20, tilt! wrote: >>>>> >>>> On 04/07/2021 10:54 PM, aitor_czr wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> gpg-netman (git-buildpackage) >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> People will think it's related to "gpg", which it isn't. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I would like to suggest the name "netman-package" for that project. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>> T.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
