Marty Alchin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Mike Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So the fact that you say we have to force nearly 15000 people to >> change is a rather void argument. > > Thanks for correcting me. I haven't administered a Google Group > before, so I didn't realize they had measures in place to deal with > these sorts of situations. > Those of us who use an email interface to Google groups would, however, still have to update our filters. Not a huge per-user load, but I'd be slightly pissed. Multiply by an appropriate factor. I'm not convinced that renaming would actually improve the situation.
FWIW python-dev has exactly the same issue, and it's handled without these continuous navel-contemplation exercises. As far as splitting up django-users into multiple groups, wouldn't the "offenders" simply start copying all django-* groups? regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
