Kevin,
Again I believe your heart is in the right place but the presumption in
your message is that there are people who need and deserve special
protection above and beyond other members of the community. While, well
intentioned, we all know how the road to hell got paved. A good policy is
one that affords benefits to all members equally or it shouldn't be in
place at all. That's why I propose an affirmative policy which is inclusive
rather than a speech or conduct code which never works as their stated
purpose would claim.
That said, I welcome any thoughtful critiques or feedback on any of the
assertions and recommendations I have made. I would especially like to know
what aspect of an affirmative policy someone who supports the other kind
finds deficient and have real evidence supporting their position if that is
the case.
best regards,
-- Ben Scherrey
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Kevin Daum <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to attempt to reach out to some folks who I think might be more
> likely than us to benefit from a code of conduct and ask if they have
> anything to add. I'm not mounting a public campaign, I just think we're
> missing some important perspectives.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAHN%3D9D7rZt8o6Ypoh8Z0ErXR3YYQ89_6SaW-q4WSgb8ewzdj%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
