On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:08:25AM -0500, quil...@riseup.net wrote: > Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> writes: > > > I don't believe that I've ever conflated his opinions with rape? It's > > possible that I've been careless with wording at some point, but while I > > may disagree with Stallman on multiple points I wouldn't categorise any > > of those as amounting to sex crimes. I will say that I've spent > > extensive amounts of time working with him to attempt to help him > > understand why some of his behaviour hurts free software rather than > > helping it, and was only willing to take this step because I saw no > > other viable approach. > > Conflating accusations against Applebaum and the quest for the removal > of Stallman does not atract more users to the free software movement. > If I were to weigh how much hurt Red Hat, Google and Cannonical (your > past employers) have done to the free software community and with which > you have collaborated, I would say it would be better to remove you > instead of him.
Where did I perform this conflation? > > I also disagree with the claim that I've "taken over" this community in > > any way. As I said, I believe that functional representation of this > > community requires at least three people, and I've asked Daniel to give > > me access to the blog in order to broadcast an appeal for people who'd > > be willing to assist in that. I'm not proposing to unilaterally appoint > > people, but in the absence of anyone else who was willing to stand for > > election we clearly need to find some way to identify potential > > candidates. > > Nobody can represent me but myself. And I would not have you represent > me, even if I had to. Ok! Would you be willing to be part of this representative group? _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
