On 05/27/2016 02:18 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Gerhard Stenzel wrote:
On 05/02/2016 10:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
What if we just make ofp_port_t 32 bits? That has to be the long-term
trend anyway because OpenFlow 1.1+ uses a 32-bit port number. The
following passes all the unit tests on i386 (though I haven't carefully
looked at all the uses of ofp_port_t), what about big-endian systems?
diff --git a/include/openvswitch/flow.h b/include/openvswitch/flow.h
...
Hi Ben, which patch do you plan to take? For master, your patch might be
better, but for 2.5 Dirk's proposal seems less invasive.
I posted a series of fixes:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/071791.html
I applied all five patch to master and "make check":
(the skipped ones are Python3 tests)
...
## ------------- ##
## Test results. ##
## ------------- ##
1765 tests were successful.
286 tests were skipped.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
