On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Gerhard Stenzel wrote: > On 05/02/2016 10:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >What if we just make ofp_port_t 32 bits? That has to be the long-term > >trend anyway because OpenFlow 1.1+ uses a 32-bit port number. The > >following passes all the unit tests on i386 (though I haven't carefully > >looked at all the uses of ofp_port_t), what about big-endian systems? > > > >diff --git a/include/openvswitch/flow.h b/include/openvswitch/flow.h > ... > > Hi Ben, which patch do you plan to take? For master, your patch might be > better, but for 2.5 Dirk's proposal seems less invasive.
I posted a series of fixes: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/071791.html _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss