Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> @ 2015-12-18 23:35 CET: > On 2015-12-18, 4:14 PM Charles-H. Schulz wrote concerning "Re: > [tdf-discuss] Re: Installing on Mac OS X": > > > 4. I call LibreOffice a clone because it is a clone. Some people try >> to dispute this unequivocal fact. > > No, that is your opinion. > > No it is a fact. When did LibreOffice have the legal right to the name > OpenOffice.org. Never. Why did LibreOffice update its code base to > Apache OpenOffice?
I'm sorry but what are you even talking about? You seem to call a clone (and apply its negative nuance to it) what started as a fork. http://www.opensource.org for more and again: http://gerrit.libreoffice.org -> what you see there is not clone of Apache OpenOffice . > > LibreOffice is not a successor to OpenOffice.org, it is a clone > derived from it. All legal, by the way. But your claims not to be a > clone are specious. It seems you want to make a political point while aggressively complaining about a real issue with language packs on OSX and repeatedly "threatening" to go back to Apache OpenOffice. My initial reaction was to help you sort out the issue, but you already had sorted it out yourself. My second reaction was to encourage you to follow your impulse and go back using Apache OpenOffice. If LibreOffice makes your life miserable, you have other choices, and after all, it's not like you've purchased it or something. My only regret is that I did not understand your point until long into the thread.... Cheers, Charles. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
