Fabian Rodriguez wrote > > You're mixing up two things here. A dev can adopt a feature (or even > implement a feature he wants) directly, but it rests on the community to > accept it, not the other way around. > > Normally a feature would go through such due process, in some cases it > may be rejected even if several devs line up to implement it. >
I think you are confusing "community-driven" with democratic as I did. Get yourself a large cup of tea and read this topic http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3725399.html Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Best-way-to-suggest-new-features-tp3784811p3794511.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
