Thank you. This, along with the ICSIS, have been very helpful in learning
about what's going on and what to expect in the developing radio
environment.

A proposed amateur radio plan (from ARISS) is in addition to what's covered
in the Architecture report and the ICSIS. I'll forward whatever I can get
as soon as I can.

-Michelle W5NYV




On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:23 AM Kevin K Gifford <kevin.giff...@colorado.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Space-RF-SDR enthusiasts -
>
> Please see below link for the recent (9/25/2019) space agencies lunar
> communications architecture final report that has detailed information on
> the planned communications links, protocols and frequencies.
>
>
> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwi85KXB8sjlAhUDWa0KHcQhA7MQFjABegQIBBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ioag.org%2FPublic%2520Documents%2FLunar%2520communications%2520architecture%2520study%2520report%2520Final%25209-25-2019.docx&usg=AOvVaw127_IRN2aAY9Kbmnt4IBlt
>
> This is the current baseline for Gateway and downstream lunar surface
> operational infrastructure.  The protocol specifications are all available
> at ccsds.org.
>
> Kevin
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Michelle Thompson <mountain.miche...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2019 5:41 PM
> *To:* John Malsbury <jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Kevin K Gifford <kevin.giff...@colorado.edu>;
> discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway
>
> Yes - I'm attempting to get a copy of the slides from recent ARISS
> presentations. There was a diagram with planned frequencies. Plenty to work
> with.
>
> -Michelle W5NYV
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57 AM John Malsbury <
> jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And you mentioned something about amateur radio portions, Michelle?
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin K Gifford <
> kevin.giff...@colorado.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I am involved in recommending the radio communications architecture for
> Gateway which is baselined to utilize CCSDS (see cases.org
> <http://secure-web.cisco.com/14BfF4_24IRkgzQdyG_jVmFaYx-p8IuZGUlAWDhtloQT8XzN1W3LBL_cN4g9UjzZYzfzFwZYsCSX9rbuLRipLqtFi_vFoOeD7UoxtQjgChHIHjVL1DjRmZaBxaCP97TiIon4SuS1OlazDts1JZkzLqqo_Hl0qA06M5CBsHM5F5Fsda-LQZqgszJV3969nFHeMXUlFEbOWB9XQxWVyQI5nqx4os_FIe5eTaHe-XgVMFwMsz0KPRA8508CeME_1tOZFpMfD3N_nZEWdxFrutEx-r0vU4g6eHdXPRo-6dTGSJZINF4NfgAeonKOsrHV0wB_XuI9bKTxba5cxUUjmSFT6fuHDaud1jnKtNj2lND4zj98TRcXGKyxtsWzlMKeq9miIB20mSjOTK0ymPTqoRcScFE6vX4eyTdsdoSETs9ICb23WVbioaFtfrts5GvWi7XzOPYo4bohK-DVr6VEnfDu1SQ/http%3A%2F%2Fcases.org>)
> protocols.
>
> For long-haul RF links (Gateway to Earth) Unified Space Link Protocol
> (USLP).
>
> For short-haul RF (Gateway to lunar surface): Proximity-1 and AOS
>
> For proximity wireless networks (around Gateway and on lunar surface)
> 802.11 n/ac baselined, 802.11ax and LTE are under strong consideration.
>
> Please feel free to respond directly if additional information is needed
> and I’ll strive to assist.
>
> Kevin
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Discuss-gnuradio <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+kevin.gifford=
> colorado....@gnu.org> on behalf of John Malsbury <
> jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:34 PM
> *To:* Michelle Thompson <mountain.miche...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway
>
> It was a cheap joke on my part (and not at all commentary on the gateway
> concept).  Disregard.
>
> I'd be down to collaborate on something open source.  Could you point to
> publicly available documents that summarize the standards/specs?
>
> -John
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Michelle Thompson <
> mountain.miche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was hesitant to ask why, but I'm curious now.
>
> I know the Gateway is controversial. I understand there's a lot of doubt
> it will actually happen. The heavy emphasis on commercial activity is
> another aspect.
>
> However, I've been asked for help on a receiving station for the amateur
> radio portions that might be included. There's a lot of overlap between
> what I do and the type of communications proposed.
>
> Comment and critique would be very appreciated here.
>
> -Michelle W5NYV
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:14 AM Müller, Marcus (CEL) <muel...@kit.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Hey John,
>
> > > Anyone working on…
> > Definitely not
>
> Does that imply they're finished?
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
>

Reply via email to