Hi Space-RF-SDR enthusiasts -

Please see below link for the recent (9/25/2019) space agencies lunar 
communications architecture final report that has detailed information on the 
planned communications links, protocols and frequencies.

    
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwi85KXB8sjlAhUDWa0KHcQhA7MQFjABegQIBBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ioag.org%2FPublic%2520Documents%2FLunar%2520communications%2520architecture%2520study%2520report%2520Final%25209-25-2019.docx&usg=AOvVaw127_IRN2aAY9Kbmnt4IBlt

This is the current baseline for Gateway and downstream lunar surface 
operational infrastructure.  The protocol specifications are all available at 
ccsds.org.

Kevin
________________________________
From: Michelle Thompson <mountain.miche...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 5:41 PM
To: John Malsbury <jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin K Gifford <kevin.giff...@colorado.edu>; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org 
<discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway

Yes - I'm attempting to get a copy of the slides from recent ARISS 
presentations. There was a diagram with planned frequencies. Plenty to work 
with.

-Michelle W5NYV




On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57 AM John Malsbury 
<jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com<mailto:jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
And you mentioned something about amateur radio portions, Michelle?

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin K Gifford 
<kevin.giff...@colorado.edu<mailto:kevin.giff...@colorado.edu>> wrote:
Hi -

I am involved in recommending the radio communications architecture for Gateway 
which is baselined to utilize CCSDS (see 
cases.org<http://secure-web.cisco.com/14BfF4_24IRkgzQdyG_jVmFaYx-p8IuZGUlAWDhtloQT8XzN1W3LBL_cN4g9UjzZYzfzFwZYsCSX9rbuLRipLqtFi_vFoOeD7UoxtQjgChHIHjVL1DjRmZaBxaCP97TiIon4SuS1OlazDts1JZkzLqqo_Hl0qA06M5CBsHM5F5Fsda-LQZqgszJV3969nFHeMXUlFEbOWB9XQxWVyQI5nqx4os_FIe5eTaHe-XgVMFwMsz0KPRA8508CeME_1tOZFpMfD3N_nZEWdxFrutEx-r0vU4g6eHdXPRo-6dTGSJZINF4NfgAeonKOsrHV0wB_XuI9bKTxba5cxUUjmSFT6fuHDaud1jnKtNj2lND4zj98TRcXGKyxtsWzlMKeq9miIB20mSjOTK0ymPTqoRcScFE6vX4eyTdsdoSETs9ICb23WVbioaFtfrts5GvWi7XzOPYo4bohK-DVr6VEnfDu1SQ/http%3A%2F%2Fcases.org>)
 protocols.

For long-haul RF links (Gateway to Earth) Unified Space Link Protocol (USLP).

For short-haul RF (Gateway to lunar surface): Proximity-1 and AOS

For proximity wireless networks (around Gateway and on lunar surface) 802.11 
n/ac baselined, 802.11ax and LTE are under strong consideration.

Please feel free to respond directly if additional information is needed and 
I’ll strive to assist.

Kevin
________________________________
From: Discuss-gnuradio 
<discuss-gnuradio-bounces+kevin.gifford=colorado....@gnu.org<mailto:colorado....@gnu.org>>
 on behalf of John Malsbury 
<jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com<mailto:jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:34 PM
To: Michelle Thompson 
<mountain.miche...@gmail.com<mailto:mountain.miche...@gmail.com>>
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org<mailto:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> 
<discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org<mailto:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>>
Subject: Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway

It was a cheap joke on my part (and not at all commentary on the gateway 
concept).  Disregard.

I'd be down to collaborate on something open source.  Could you point to 
publicly available documents that summarize the standards/specs?

-John

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Michelle Thompson 
<mountain.miche...@gmail.com<mailto:mountain.miche...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I was hesitant to ask why, but I'm curious now.

I know the Gateway is controversial. I understand there's a lot of doubt it 
will actually happen. The heavy emphasis on commercial activity is another 
aspect.

However, I've been asked for help on a receiving station for the amateur radio 
portions that might be included. There's a lot of overlap between what I do and 
the type of communications proposed.

Comment and critique would be very appreciated here.

-Michelle W5NYV




On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:14 AM Müller, Marcus (CEL) 
<muel...@kit.edu<mailto:muel...@kit.edu>> wrote:
Hey John,

> > Anyone working on…
> Definitely not

Does that imply they're finished?

Best regards,
Marcus

Reply via email to