And you mentioned something about amateur radio portions, Michelle? On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin K Gifford <kevin.giff...@colorado.edu> wrote:
> Hi - > > I am involved in recommending the radio communications architecture for > Gateway which is baselined to utilize CCSDS (see cases.org) protocols. > > For long-haul RF links (Gateway to Earth) Unified Space Link Protocol > (USLP). > > For short-haul RF (Gateway to lunar surface): Proximity-1 and AOS > > For proximity wireless networks (around Gateway and on lunar surface) > 802.11 n/ac baselined, 802.11ax and LTE are under strong consideration. > > Please feel free to respond directly if additional information is needed > and I’ll strive to assist. > > Kevin > ------------------------------ > *From:* Discuss-gnuradio <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+kevin.gifford= > colorado....@gnu.org> on behalf of John Malsbury < > jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:34 PM > *To:* Michelle Thompson <mountain.miche...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> > *Subject:* Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway > > It was a cheap joke on my part (and not at all commentary on the gateway > concept). Disregard. > > I'd be down to collaborate on something open source. Could you point to > publicly available documents that summarize the standards/specs? > > -John > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Michelle Thompson < > mountain.miche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was hesitant to ask why, but I'm curious now. > > I know the Gateway is controversial. I understand there's a lot of doubt > it will actually happen. The heavy emphasis on commercial activity is > another aspect. > > However, I've been asked for help on a receiving station for the amateur > radio portions that might be included. There's a lot of overlap between > what I do and the type of communications proposed. > > Comment and critique would be very appreciated here. > > -Michelle W5NYV > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:14 AM Müller, Marcus (CEL) <muel...@kit.edu> > wrote: > > Hey John, > > > > Anyone working on… > > Definitely not > > Does that imply they're finished? > > Best regards, > Marcus > >
