Yes - I'm attempting to get a copy of the slides from recent ARISS
presentations. There was a diagram with planned frequencies. Plenty to work
with.

-Michelle W5NYV




On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57 AM John Malsbury <jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> And you mentioned something about amateur radio portions, Michelle?
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin K Gifford <
> kevin.giff...@colorado.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I am involved in recommending the radio communications architecture for
>> Gateway which is baselined to utilize CCSDS (see cases.org) protocols.
>>
>> For long-haul RF links (Gateway to Earth) Unified Space Link Protocol
>> (USLP).
>>
>> For short-haul RF (Gateway to lunar surface): Proximity-1 and AOS
>>
>> For proximity wireless networks (around Gateway and on lunar surface)
>> 802.11 n/ac baselined, 802.11ax and LTE are under strong consideration.
>>
>> Please feel free to respond directly if additional information is needed
>> and I’ll strive to assist.
>>
>> Kevin
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Discuss-gnuradio <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+kevin.gifford=
>> colorado....@gnu.org> on behalf of John Malsbury <
>> jmalsbury.perso...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:34 PM
>> *To:* Michelle Thompson <mountain.miche...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: Lunar Orbiting Platform Gateway
>>
>> It was a cheap joke on my part (and not at all commentary on the gateway
>> concept).  Disregard.
>>
>> I'd be down to collaborate on something open source.  Could you point to
>> publicly available documents that summarize the standards/specs?
>>
>> -John
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Michelle Thompson <
>> mountain.miche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I was hesitant to ask why, but I'm curious now.
>>
>> I know the Gateway is controversial. I understand there's a lot of doubt
>> it will actually happen. The heavy emphasis on commercial activity is
>> another aspect.
>>
>> However, I've been asked for help on a receiving station for the amateur
>> radio portions that might be included. There's a lot of overlap between
>> what I do and the type of communications proposed.
>>
>> Comment and critique would be very appreciated here.
>>
>> -Michelle W5NYV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:14 AM Müller, Marcus (CEL) <muel...@kit.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey John,
>>
>> > > Anyone working on…
>> > Definitely not
>>
>> Does that imply they're finished?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Marcus
>>
>>

Reply via email to