On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:12:23PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote: > On 2/25/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I guess I'm concerned that some of the OPS could take more than a > >single tick. E.g., I2C or SPI ops. Thoses buses run at something > >like 100kHz to 400kHz. If all execution delays are known, then > >OP_DELAY seems fine (and easy). > > I share the same concern over the I2C or SPI ops, but I would think it > is pretty easy for the host API for the daughterboard in question to > have the delays hardcoded and figured out. That would make it pretty > easy to calculate violations within a TDMA sequence or frequency > hopping scheme before it even gets down to the USRP. > > Brian
OK. Sounds good to me. I'll add OP_DELAY Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
