On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:33:23PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote: > >Would you prefer that both types of data occurred in the same packet? > > > >Eric > > Not at all - it makes much more sense to calculate when to bring up / > tear down the RF stuff on the host rather than inside the FPGA and > back calculate. > > Is the timestamp details of the operations just going to happen one > after the other?
That was the plan. > It might be beneficial to bandwidth to have a NOP > command with the argument being number of ticks - that way you don't > have to send 2 512-byte packets when you want things to occur slightly > offset in time. That sounds good. Would you interpret it as a delta-t from the timestamp in the header? I'm thinking about the case where there are multiple DELAY ops in the payload. Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
