On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:28:47PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:10:06PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote: > > On 2/25/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 07:29:01PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote: > > >> Some preliminary questions: > > >> > > >> How are the operations linked with the transmit sequences? > > > > > >I'm not sure I understand this question. > > > > I am not sure how the operations being sent down are associated with a > > payload. Are they just 32-bit aligned in either an in or out packet? > > If so, should there be something in the header to say how many > > operations are there before the actual modulated data starts? > > If Chan == 0x1f the payload contains control operations, otherwise the > payload contains homogeneous samples (the type of which is specified > by the contents of some register(s) that were set earlier). > > > >> Are operations sent down in bulk, or one at a time? > > > > > >You can send as many as will fit in the payload. > > >Unless you doing something like hopping, I suspect that command > > >packets are relatively infrequent. > > > > It looks like the assumption I made just previously is accurate - the > > operations are in the payload along with modulation data. > > No, they're distinct, based on the Chan field in the header. > > My thinking behind this was to keep life simple for the common case: > If Chan != 0x1f, clock payload into appropriate signal processing pipeline. > If Chan == 0x1f, do the potentially slow, complicated work... > > Eric
Would you prefer that both types of data occurred in the same packet? Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
