On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:09:45PM -0800, mao mao wrote: > I haven't tried any of those python codes yet. I am a > Windows programmer and I have Matlab Windows version > running on my PC. So all I want is being able to > download data off USRP to my Windows PC so I can try > some algorithm.
I understand, no problem. > porting usb driver for USRP is not very difficult > since libusb for Windows works very well. It took me > less than a day to port the USRP usb driver to MSVC. I'd love to have any patches that it required to make this stuff run natively under windows. There are a few folks who have cross-compiled using mingw and cygwin, but I think you may be the first to invest time trying it with MS tools. > And it looks that my Windows USRP USB driver is fast > enough to handle 32MB/s, because when I use > decim=4,channel=1 or decim=8,channel=2, I'll get > 32MB/s data off USRP without any overrun error. Hmmm. Neither of these sound like reasonable results. decim = 4 would give you 64M/4 = 16MS/s across the USB. Each sample is 4 bytes (2-bytes I and 2-bytes Q), so that would be 64MB/s which is impossible. Which rbf file are you loading? If you're not doing anything special, you'll be getting the std_2rxhb_2tx.rbf which should be fine. Are you building with the code out of the usrp svn repository? That is: $ svn co http://usrp.svnrepository.com/svn/usrp/trunk usrp I just tried this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apps]$ ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 8 -M 128 xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 4.19 seconds. 3.2e+07 bytes/sec. cpu time = 0.78 noverruns = 0 Which gives the result I expect: 32MB/s If I try with -D 4, I get overruns as expected: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apps]$ ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 4 -M 128 rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun rx_overrun And one more data point: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apps]$ ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 16 -M 128 xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 8.39 seconds. 1.6e+07 bytes/sec. cpu time = 0.392 noverruns = 0 > The problem is that, I was supposed to get 32MB/s data > with decim=8, channel=1, format=0x300, mux=0xf0f0f0f0 > setting, instead, I got 16MB/s. I am not sure if I was > using the right parameters, that's why I am asking for > help. Have you built test_usrp_standard_rx? Do you get results similar to the ones above? > To go the linux way I have to find a spare PC with a > good enough usb controller. That will add more time > and cost to me :(. As long as you are able to sustain 32MB/s across the USB, I think you'll be fine. Again, any patches required to make any of gnuradio compile natively under windows would be most appreciated. It may be faster however to use mingw or cygwin under windows. That would allow you to use our existing build system. http://www.mingw.org http://www.cygwin.org Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
