On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:08:04AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just talking
> > _completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where
> > any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other
> > integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side
> > repo.
> I think I asked this question before, but I don't remember the answer.
> Will Dennis's work include some way of letting high priority packages
> break low priority packages?  As an example, I maintain the polymake

It's a good question. :) I don't know the answer, but it does make
sense to me that we have something like this.

> Either way, we should let polymake break and let me fix it as soon as
> I can.  Perl updates should not be delayed.  Will that be possible?

Maybe polymake should be in its own repository with a version of perl
that it's known to work with.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to