On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 03:25 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Alec, > > I'm not sure if I'm getting a false positive or not. My package nec2c[1] > says it's got a md5sum error with the source but I always use curl to > download the sources (unless it's a github source and I use links). I just > re-downloaded the source and the md5's match... > > $ md5sum nec2c-1.1.tar.bz2 > 83e979e7e88454698ee5a69a86ddd66b nec2c-1.1.tar.bz2 > $ md5sum rpmbuild/nec2c/SOURCES/nec2c-1.1.tar.bz2 > 83e979e7e88454698ee5a69a86ddd66b rpmbuild/nec2c/SOURCES/nec2c-1.1.tar.bz2 > > Richard > > [1] http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/packages/nec2c > > > Hm.... When I run f-r on the above package I get not only a checksum > error but also a diff file (one line changed in a header). Is it that the > download links in the spec doesn't match what you use? > Whoops, I think I figured it out... I'm running version 1.1 locally but I never did an official fedora build. The error must be from the previous maintainer with the 0.9 version... I need to push new builds :) Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
