On 08/26/2013 03:50 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Parag N(पराग़) <panem...@gmail.com
<mailto:panem...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alec Leamas
<leamas.a...@gmail.com <mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all
packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at
[2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue.
We have discussed sending email about these results to the
package owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it
might be good if you check your own packages, chances are that
something otherwise unnoticed is discovered. Please don't
forget the README.
For those interested in the overall distribution, the package
by issue reports perhaps also might add something as well as
the 'stats' file in the top dir.
I see some of my packages listed and when I look for why its
listed, I can't figure out. I now need to run fedora-review on
those packages. If possible provide results directory with all
three log files to understand what is wrong in the package.
Thanks Alec for giving me some understanding on this on IRC. I
found http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/README and as
written there I see my packages are clean.
[cut]
Just for others listening to this: all packages are listed, being in the
list does not mean that the package is bad per se. See The README. And
if you feel low due to some warnings, take some comfort in the 'stats'
file. You are not alone ;)
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
