On Thursday, 24 April 2025 15:12:42 Central European Summer Time Peter Boy Uni wrote: > Interesting. Could you perhaps elaborate on which of our standards > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/#_our_standar > ds) this post violates? - Not being kind to the KDE SIG - Not being respectful to other viewpoints ( KDE SIG and others) - Not focusing on what is best for the community ( this has already been dealt with, he and another contributor take every opportunity to bring this topic up ) - Bringing controversy _again_ for an already dealt with topic - Repeatedly instigating conflict, and baiting people into arguments
While I understand 1 or 2 of the points my be subjective, others are very clear. This thread was about an issue regarding GDM and X11 sessions. There is no need to bring up the topic of X11 support on KDE Fedora. Funnily enough, I agree with the request to bring the X11 Gnome session as removing it should have been part of a change proposal. Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
