On 4/4/23 11:57 AM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 6:52 PM Kinney, Michael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com> wrote:
I see value in adding a new name.
I see no value in a non-backwards compatible change to delete/rename a fully
supported one.
As Leif said, you reduce all sorts of possible confusion.
VS2013 builds only for Visual Studio 2013 tools, VS2017 does the same
for 2017, GCC5 meanwhile builds on anything from (probably GCC 4.x,
since LTO, 2011) to GCC 13 (to be released soon, 2023).
Surely downstreams can adapt to *this one cosmetic change* that
changes no behavior.
Nope, GCC5 currently only builds on GCC _6_ and newer, since we don't
specify -std=c++11. Which makes this discussion even more ridiculous IMO.
--
Rebecca Cran
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102517): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102517
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98051589/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
