On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 16:57:18 +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:49 PM Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bsdio.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC49
> > and GCC5.
>
> Please rename them? There's no point in keeping their current names
> anyway. I guarantee you that most people are not really able to guess
> GCC49 to be the "non-LTO" flavor.
>
> And IMO Ard has already proved the value in non-LTO builds anyway, so
> yeah. GCC and GCCNOLTO please.
Agreed. I don't think there are any outstanding items that need
resolving.
I'd be very happy to stop hearing "you need GCC 5 in order to build
edk2" misunderstandings.
/
Leif
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102501): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102501
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98051589/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
