On 4/4/23 10:32 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 16:57:18 +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:49 PM Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bsdio.com> wrote:
Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC49
and GCC5.
Please rename them? There's no point in keeping their current names
anyway. I guarantee you that most people are not really able to guess
GCC49 to be the "non-LTO" flavor.
And IMO Ard has already proved the value in non-LTO builds anyway, so
yeah. GCC and GCCNOLTO please.
Agreed. I don't think there are any outstanding items that need
resolving.
I'd be very happy to stop hearing "you need GCC 5 in order to build
edk2" misunderstandings.
Thanks! As a new co-maintainer I was trying to be diplomatic, but I
really don't see any reason to keep the existing names.
I'll send out a v3 patch series with all the fixes I and others have
identified.
--
Rebecca Cran
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102510): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102510
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98051589/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
