Rebecca: If you plan to change GCC49 tool chain to GCCNOLTO name, I would suggest to take the same rule that adds GCCNOLTO tool chain first.
We still have downstream AARCH64 platforms to use GCC49 tool chain now. Thanks Liming > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] <[email protected]> 代表 Ard > Biesheuvel > 发送时间: 2023年4月5日 18:22 > 收件人: Rebecca Cran <[email protected]> > 抄送: Kinney, Michael D <[email protected]>; Pedro Falcato > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Leif Lindholm > <[email protected]>; Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; > Oliver Smith-Denny <[email protected]>; Jiang, Guomin > <[email protected]>; Lu, Xiaoyu1 <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian J > <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Ard > Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; Justen, Jordan L > <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>; Feng, > Bob C <[email protected]>; Andrew Fish <[email protected]> > 主题: Re: 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] > BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete > CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update > CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 20:36, Rebecca Cran <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks, deprecating it for a while makes a lot of sense. We can consider > > removing it in 6-12 months maybe? > > > > I would at least wait for a stable release to appear that supports > both GCC5 and GCC/GCCNOLTO, and then perhaps queue the removal (and > document it) for the subsequent one? > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#102574): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102574 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98096199/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
