Sounds good to me. john
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > On 11/08/2010 03:41 PM, John Plevyak wrote: > >> >> I agree that it could be a problem to have a single veto. Perhaps lazy >> consensus falling back to 2/3 majority? >> > > Sounds too complicated IMO. :) > > We could just do lazy consensus in the bylaws for now, for the release > artifacts, and if it ever becomes a problem, we revert to public flogging. > > Joking aside, we can change the Bylaws later if this would become an > unresolvable problem (that's why I put in some additions on voting on > changes to the Bylaws, which in my proposal are 2/3 majority votes). > > -- leif > >
