I agree that it could be a problem to have a single veto. Perhaps lazy consensus falling back to 2/3 majority?
john On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Secondly, I am wondering if Majority is the correct way to do a release. >> Seems >> to me a release is a significant event, and perhaps lazy consensus would >> be >> more >> appropriate. >> > > I'm fine with that, if that's what people prefer? Basically, this would > make any release vetoable by a single binding vote (which I've heard has > caused problems with other projects, but that doesn't mean we'd ever have > that problem). > > Any other thoughts / comments? I think this means we'll have to update the > proposal, and start a new vote. But please post comments and suggestions > asap so we can get this finished. > > Cheers, > > -- Leif > >
