On 11/08/2010 02:27 PM, John Plevyak wrote:
I have a couple concerns.
Primarily with Consensus definition. I think we need to say that if you
don't
respond within a particular time (1 week) then you obtain. I wouldn't want
to have folks who have vanished hold up a "consensus".
Agreed, so should we add a section saying that unless otherwise
specified, votes will run for 72 hours ?
Secondly, I am wondering if Majority is the correct way to do a release.
Seems
to me a release is a significant event, and perhaps lazy consensus would be
more
appropriate.
I'm fine with that, if that's what people prefer? Basically, this would
make any release vetoable by a single binding vote (which I've heard
has caused problems with other projects, but that doesn't mean we'd ever
have that problem).
Any other thoughts / comments? I think this means we'll have to update
the proposal, and start a new vote. But please post comments and
suggestions asap so we can get this finished.
Cheers,
-- Leif
