Abstain... damn those spell checkers On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:27 PM, John Plevyak <jplev...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I have a couple concerns. > > Primarily with Consensus definition. I think we need to say that if you > don't > respond within a particular time (1 week) then you obtain. I wouldn't > want > to have folks who have vanished hold up a "consensus". > > Secondly, I am wondering if Majority is the correct way to do a release. > Seems > to me a release is a significant event, and perhaps lazy consensus would be > more > appropriate. > > Comments? > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've not received any further comments or suggestions on the proposed >> Bylaws document, so I would like to start the vote for this. This is an >> important issue, so I urge all PMC members, and the entire community to read >> the proposal, and vote. Please cast your vote (please vote!), +1, -1 or 0 >> within the next 72 hours. >> >> In particular, make sure you are OK with the vote requirements in this >> proposal. For example, a release artifact is only releasable if there's lazy >> majority (at least 3 +1 binding votes, and more +1's than -1's). So vote! >> :). >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- leif >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/BylawsDraft >> > >
