dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Ivan Zhakov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Julian Foad
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Julian Foad
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Martin Edgar Furter Rathod
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Glossary of attacks (was: Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Linking to the archives (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Sharing .svn directories across wc's (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Sharing .svn directories across wc's (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Sharing .svn directories across wc's (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Sharing .svn directories across wc's (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
• [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf Alexandr Miloslavskiy
• "util.c' line 96: assertion failed" when repository URL has "username:password@" Pavel Lyalyakin
  • Re: "util.c' line 96: assertion failed" when repository URL has "username:password@" Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: "util.c' line 96: assertion failed" when repository URL has "username:password@" Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: "util.c' line 96: assertion failed" when repository URL has "username:password@" Branko Čibej
• Re: svn commit: r1891737 - in /subversion/site/staging: docs/community-guide/general.part.html news.html Nathan Hartman
  • Re: svn commit: r1891737 - in /subversion/site/staging: docs/community-guide/general.part.html news.html Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: svn commit: r1891737 - in /subversion/site/staging: docs/community-guide/general.part.html news.html Nathan Hartman
• Website merge mobile-friendly design from staging to publish Daniel Sahlberg
• [PATCH] Makefile: tests should depend on mod_dontdothat Daniel Shahaf

• Earlier messages
• Later messages