Den lör 14 aug. 2021 14:43Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> skrev:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 23:44:53 +0200: > > Den tis 3 aug. 2021 kl 23:40 skrev <dsahlb...@apache.org>: > > > > > Author: dsahlberg > > > Date: Tue Aug 3 21:40:40 2021 > > > New Revision: 1891998 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891998&view=rev > > > Log: > > > * STATUS: Upgrading my vote for r1891908 (now being a full committer). > > > > > > Modified: > > > subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS > > > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS > > > URL: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1891998&r1=1891997&r2=1891998&view=diff > > > > > > > ============================================================================== > > > --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original) > > > +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Tue Aug 3 21:40:40 2021 > > > @@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ Candidate changes: > > > Justification: > > > Small fix. Prevents spurious hard fails of 'make davautocheck'. > > > Votes: > > > - +1: danielsh > > > - +1 (non-binding): dsahlberg > > > + +1: danielsh, dsahlberg > > > > > > Veto-blocked changes: > > > ===================== > > > > > > > @Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> Should this be backported also to > > 1.10.x? It exhibits the same problem and the same fix applies there. If > so, > > I can copy over the same backporting proposal. > > Yes. As you say, mod_dontdothat is a hard dependency of the test suite > in 1.10.x too, so adding the dependency in Makefile shouldn't break > anything, even in an LTS branch. I've taken your email as a +1 to > backport and added the nomination with both of our votes. > Yes, +1 from me. Thanks! /dsahlberg
