Stefan Kueng wrote: >I'm still doing some testing with the new --pin-externals feature, and I >found a situation which I'm not sure should be handled that way: > >imagine the repo is at r100. Now if one does a >svn copy http://server/trunk http://server/branches/b1 -r50 --pin-externals > >then all externals get pinned at r100. But shouldn't in-repo externals >get pinned to r50 instead? At least in this kind of copy, I think those >externals should get pinned to r50?
just thinking out loud: would making --pin-externals require/allow a revision parameter be an alternative? -- Lorenz
