Hi,
I'm still doing some testing with the new --pin-externals feature, and I
found a situation which I'm not sure should be handled that way:
imagine the repo is at r100. Now if one does a
svn copy http://server/trunk http://server/branches/b1 -r50 --pin-externals
then all externals get pinned at r100. But shouldn't in-repo externals
get pinned to r50 instead? At least in this kind of copy, I think those
externals should get pinned to r50?
Also, the svn_client_copy6 API misses the SVN_DEPRECATED macro.
Stefan
