On 05/24/2011 12:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That >>> also means putting it into the alphas. >>> >>> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then >>> we're good. >>> >> Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known >> showstopper bugs? > > I've been using ra_serf for 2.5 years. I have had zero productivity > problems. I see no reason to assume that people will have problems > with any release based on ra_serf. You have identified some edge cases > which we need to fix, but I don't see it as a blocker for an alpha.
With respect, "it works for me" is not such a useful argument when "me" is probably not using ra_serf on every common platform/environment/dataset/etc. Surely enough folks here that you trust to not be complete idiots have struggled with ra_serf over the past several years to justify at least skepticism on this front. :-) But sure, I agree that we may go to alpha without addressing every known major issue here. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
