Classic SGTM. On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 1:12 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd propose not to change the name of "Spark Connect" - the name > represents the characteristic of the mode (separation of layer for client > and server). Trying to remove the part of "Connect" would just make > confusion. > > +1 for Classic to existing mode, till someone comes up with better > alternatives. > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 8:50 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I was thinking about a similar option too but I ended up giving this up >> .. It's quite unlikely at this moment but suppose that we have another >> Spark Connect-ish component in the far future and it would be challenging >> to come up with another name ... Another case is that we might have to cope >> with the cases like Spark Connect, vs Spark (with Spark Connect) and Spark >> (without Spark Connect) .. >> >> On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 at 09:59, Holden Karau <holden.ka...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think perhaps Spark Connect could be phrased as “Basic* Spark” & >>> existing Spark could be “Full Spark” given the API limitations of Spark >>> connect. >>> >>> *I was also thinking Core here but we’ve used core to refer to the RDD >>> APIs for too long to reuse it here. >>> >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:02 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Classic is much better than Legacy. : ) >>>> >>>> Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> 于2024年7月18日周四 16:58写道： >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I noticed that we need to standardize our terminology before moving >>>>> forward. For instance, when documenting, 'Spark without Spark Connect' is >>>>> too long and verbose. Additionally, I've observed that we use various >>>>> names >>>>> for Spark without Spark Connect: Spark Classic, Classic Spark, Legacy >>>>> Spark, etc. >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we consistently refer to it as Spark Classic (vs. Spark >>>>> Connect). >>>>> >>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks! >>>>> >>>>
