I think perhaps Spark Connect could be phrased as “Basic* Spark” & existing Spark could be “Full Spark” given the API limitations of Spark connect.
*I was also thinking Core here but we’ve used core to refer to the RDD APIs for too long to reuse it here. Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:02 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Classic is much better than Legacy. : ) > > Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> 于2024年7月18日周四 16:58写道： > >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that we need to standardize our terminology before moving >> forward. For instance, when documenting, 'Spark without Spark Connect' is >> too long and verbose. Additionally, I've observed that we use various names >> for Spark without Spark Connect: Spark Classic, Classic Spark, Legacy >> Spark, etc. >> >> I propose that we consistently refer to it as Spark Classic (vs. Spark >> Connect). >> >> Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks! >> >
