+1 for Classic On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:58 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for 'Classic' as well :) > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:15 AM Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 for 'Classic' >> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:03 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Classic is much better than Legacy. : ) >>> >>> Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> 于2024年7月18日周四 16:58写道： >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I noticed that we need to standardize our terminology before moving >>>> forward. For instance, when documenting, 'Spark without Spark Connect' is >>>> too long and verbose. Additionally, I've observed that we use various names >>>> for Spark without Spark Connect: Spark Classic, Classic Spark, Legacy >>>> Spark, etc. >>>> >>>> I propose that we consistently refer to it as Spark Classic (vs. Spark >>>> Connect). >>>> >>>> Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks! >>>> >>> -- John Zhuge
