+1 for 'Classic' as well :)

On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:15 AM Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for 'Classic'
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:03 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Classic is much better than Legacy. : )
>>
>> Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> 于2024年7月18日周四 16:58写道:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I noticed that we need to standardize our terminology before moving
>>> forward. For instance, when documenting, 'Spark without Spark Connect' is
>>> too long and verbose. Additionally, I've observed that we use various names
>>> for Spark without Spark Connect: Spark Classic, Classic Spark, Legacy
>>> Spark, etc.
>>>
>>> I propose that we consistently refer to it as Spark Classic (vs. Spark
>>> Connect).
>>>
>>> Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks!
>>>
>>

Reply via email to