dev  

Messages by Date

• 2025/03/25 Re: Revert of [SPARK-51229][BUILD][CONNECT] Fix dependency:analyze goal on connect common Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: Revert of [SPARK-51229][BUILD][CONNECT] Fix dependency:analyze goal on connect common Reynold Xin
• 2025/03/25 Re: Revert of [SPARK-51229][BUILD][CONNECT] Fix dependency:analyze goal on connect common Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/25 Unsubscribe Huibo Peng
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: Revert of [SPARK-51229][BUILD][CONNECT] Fix dependency:analyze goal on connect common Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Sean Owen
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Gengliang Wang
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Holden Karau
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Reynold Xin
• 2025/03/25 Revert of [SPARK-51229][BUILD][CONNECT] Fix dependency:analyze goal on connect common Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/25 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/25 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/25 Re: setuptools 78.0.0 does not work with pyspark 3.x releases Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/24 Unsubscribe Jaskaran singh
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: setuptools 78.0.0 does not work with pyspark 3.x releases Bjørn Jørgensen
• 2025/03/24 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/24 Re: setuptools 78.0.0 does not work with pyspark 3.x releases James Willis
• 2025/03/24 Re: setuptools 78.0.0 does not work with pyspark 3.x releases Holden Karau
• 2025/03/24 Re: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Qi Tan
• 2025/03/24 setuptools 78.0.0 does not work with pyspark 3.x releases Sean Owen
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/24 Re: [DISCUSS] SPARK-51318: Remove `jar` files from Apache Spark repository and disable affected tests Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/24 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/24 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade Hive compile time dependency to 4.0 Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/23 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Yang Jie
• 2025/03/23 Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade Hive compile time dependency to 4.0 Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/23 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Kristopher Kane
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Bobby
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Spark 3.5.2 and Hadoop 3.4.1 slow performance Prem Sahoo
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 serge rielau . com
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Anurag Mantripragada
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Yuming Wang
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Peter Toth
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 DB Tsai
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/22 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Bobby
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Zhou Jiang
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Anton Okolnychyi
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Denny Lee
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Jules Damji
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 L. C. Hsieh
• 2025/03/21 Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Gengliang Wang
• 2025/03/21 [VOTE] SPIP: Constraints in DSv2 Anton Okolnychyi
• 2025/03/20 [SPARK-51264][SQL][JDBC] JDBC write keeps driver connection open unnecessarily Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/20 Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Rozov, Vlad
• 2025/03/20 [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0 (RC3) Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/19 Re: Contribution to Spark SQL: new data type TIME Max Gekk
• 2025/03/18 RE: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Qi Tan
• 2025/03/18 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/18 [RESULT][VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/18 [VOTE][RESULT][FINAL] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/18 Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/18 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/18 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Single-pass Analyzer for Catalyst Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/18 Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/18 Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/17 Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/17 RE: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps 谭琦
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps serge rielau . com
• 2025/03/17 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Hyukjin Kwon
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Gengliang Wang
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Reynold Xin
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps serge rielau . com
• 2025/03/17 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Yuanjian Li
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Reynold Xin
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Sakthi
• 2025/03/17 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Zhou Jiang
• 2025/03/17 Re: Code formatting tech debt Rob Reeves
• 2025/03/17 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/17 Unsubscribe bruce COTTMAN
• 2025/03/17 Unsubscribe Ratnesh Mishra
• 2025/03/17 [PROPOSE] Fix the procedural steps on the incorrect config fixes Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/17 Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Swift language Martin Grund
• 2025/03/17 Unsubscribe Ramin Orujov
• 2025/03/17 Unsubscribe Ramin Orujov
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Reynold Xin
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Holden Karau
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Holden Karau
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Unsubscribe Zac Wang
• 2025/03/16 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Holden Karau
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Swift language Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/16 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Holden Karau
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Swift language Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] New Spark Connect Client repository for Swift language Martin Grund
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 Re: [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 [DISCUSS] Involve any hack / workaround to not include vendor name in migration logic Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/16 [ANNOUNCE] Apache Sedona 1.7.1 released Jia Yu
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps DB Tsai
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Holden Karau
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 [VOTE] Technical Justification for the veto of the "Retain migration logic..." code change proposal is not valid Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Ángel Álvarez Pascua
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Holden Karau
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mich Talebzadeh
• 2025/03/15 Re: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Wenchen Fan
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Sean Owen
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 RE: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps 谭琦
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Tình Trần
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/15 [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Susham kumar reddy Yerabolu
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Ramin Orujov
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Pranshul Goyal
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe bruce COTTMAN
• 2025/03/15 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Stan Zhai
• 2025/03/15 Code formatting tech debt Rob Reeves
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Aswin Rajasekharan
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe Aditya Gunjal
• 2025/03/15 Unsubscribe 朱静
• 2025/03/15 Re: Code formatting tech debt Asif Shahid
• 2025/03/14 Re: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps Szehon Ho
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Dongjoon Hyun
• 2025/03/14 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mridul Muralidharan
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mridul Muralidharan
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Jungtaek Lim
• 2025/03/13 Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Retain migration logic of incorrect `spark.databricks.*` configuration in Spark 4.0.x Mark Hamstra

• Earlier messages
• Later messages