Re: 1: We have PR [1908], but no issue AFAIK.

[1908] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1908

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi Robert
>
> Yes, 1 has to be sorted out before the release. Do we have an issue
> about that (beyond the thread discussion) ? I already mentioned my
> "concern" about the shadow jar in Spark client. It's important but it
> can be improved later. The Maven coordinates are more problematic (if
> we change later). So, let's focus and address the Maven coordinates
> first.
>
> For 2, I think it's not a blocker now, it has to be fixed when the
> release will be "published".
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote:
> >
> > Not "labeled" as blockers, but two things to clarify:
> >
> > 1. The "[DISCUSS[ Spark Client jars: maven coordinates and shading"
> thread
> >
> > 2. Having the docs for a release appear in a URL containing "in-dev"
> > doesn't feel right.
> >
> >
> > The first one might have implications to the release?
> >
> >
> > On 23.06.25 13:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I don't see any Issue or PR with the 1.0-blocker label.
> > >
> > > I guess we are ready to cut 1.0.0 right ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 8:12 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> +1 on documenting on the site, which I don't think it's a 1.0
> blocker. It's
> > >> been added into the release notes[1].
> > >>
> > >> [1].
> > >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JDVdQraoEhOIv7agy7WzIuBQdW0_16jW-DBrnanuW7A/edit?tab=t.0
> > >>
> > >> Yufei
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:08 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks for the heads up, Prashant!
> > >>>
> > >>> I agree that it was a good idea to pull Compaction Rollback into 1.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> Do we want to document this feature, or just mention it in release
> notes?
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Dmitri.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Prashant Singh
> > >>> <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hey folks,
> > >>>> I want to thank the whole community for jumping in for the reviews
> of
> > >>>> Rollback Compaction on conflicts feature here
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/793cf086f1f784c36296b1ea75298a08ce608ef2
> > >>>> .
> > >>>> I am happy to share that it has now merged, since the 1.0 boat has
> not
> > >>>> sailed, I cherry-picked the feature to 1.0, it's a clean
> cherry-pick !
> > >>>> I believe it will strongly help in Apache Polaris adoption, and
> > >>>> sincerely thank everyone who participated !
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Prashant Singh
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:13 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Posting here for visibility:
> > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z30f3cfvm41hxlbxgp4fqdpv7mfgnv8
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I opened that discussion thread about the new Spark Client plugin.
> My
> > >>>>> concern is that the linked
> > >>>>> PR looks like it may require changing out approach to how we
> publish
> > >>>> Maven
> > >>>>> artifacts
> > >>>>> for that client.... Therefore, I'd like to have some more clarity
> on
> > >>> that
> > >>>>> issue in order to prevent
> > >>>>> suddenly changing Maven coordinates right after the 1.0 release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Let's use the other thread for technical discussions. This message
> is
> > >>>> only
> > >>>>> to flag potential
> > >>>>> 1.0 impact.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Dmitri.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:13 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> The rename commits(
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/ab228afa4d975faabb7aaf1e8abb0804f5b9d353
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/fccc51ab111b7ee1a0d3c8898e94b0c54bc73d80
> > >>>>>> )
> > >>>>>> have been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> We could re-branch, but folks mentioned there are a few Python
> > >>>>>>> commits(like https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1810) we are
> > >>> not
> > >>>>>>> comfortable with having them in 1.0 branch.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Feel free to bring up a discussion for more PRs you think it's
> 1.0
> > >>>>>>> blockers and needed in 1.0.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > >>>> di...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi Yufei,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> As discussed before, I think it is preferable to do the renames
> > >>> in /
> > >>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>> 1.0 because module names affect published Maven artifact names.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x from `main`?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>> Dmitri.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need
> > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695
> > >>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>> 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if it's ready, but
> > >>> I'm
> > >>>>> OK
> > >>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>> either way.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com
> >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 was resolved by
> > >>>>>> #1830,
> > >>>>>>>>>> #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are cherry-picked to
> > >>>> 1.0
> > >>>>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>>>>> already.
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 was just
> > >>> resolved
> > >>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>> #1889,
> > >>>>>>>>>> which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > >>>>>>>> di...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yufei, et al.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got merged
> > >>>> recently...
> > >>>>>> WDYT
> > >>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after addressing the
> > >>>>>>>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>>>>> issues?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Dmitri.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu <
> > >>> flyrain...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and
> > >>> I
> > >>>>>>>> believe
> > >>>>>>>>>>> it's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release
> > >>> ASAP.
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few
> > >>> remaining
> > >>>>>>>> blockers
> > >>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> need to resolve.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>> 1.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> next Monday at 9 AM PST.  At the same time, sharing all
> > >>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>> marked
> > >>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel
> > >>>> free
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>> chime
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or
> > >>>> pick
> > >>>>>> any
> > >>>>>>>>> up.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the list:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>     - Add CI for Python code (
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058
> > >>>> #1058),
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - Task handling is incomplete (#774)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris
> > >>>>> (#755)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory
> > >>>> leaks
> > >>>>>>>> (#563)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable
> > >>>> locations
> > >>>>>>>> (#552)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not
> > >>> happen
> > >>>>>> (#544)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>        <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the
> > >>>> google
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> spreadsheet here:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to