Hi All, Do you think we should include this new issue into 1.0?
https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1943 Thanks, Dmitri. On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:32 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot for everyone working on this! Sent out the 1.0.0 RC0 release > vote mail! > > Yufei > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 6:27 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Re: 1: We have PR [1908], but no issue AFAIK. > > > > [1908] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1908 > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Robert > > > > > > Yes, 1 has to be sorted out before the release. Do we have an issue > > > about that (beyond the thread discussion) ? I already mentioned my > > > "concern" about the shadow jar in Spark client. It's important but it > > > can be improved later. The Maven coordinates are more problematic (if > > > we change later). So, let's focus and address the Maven coordinates > > > first. > > > > > > For 2, I think it's not a blocker now, it has to be fixed when the > > > release will be "published". > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > Not "labeled" as blockers, but two things to clarify: > > > > > > > > 1. The "[DISCUSS[ Spark Client jars: maven coordinates and shading" > > > thread > > > > > > > > 2. Having the docs for a release appear in a URL containing "in-dev" > > > > doesn't feel right. > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one might have implications to the release? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23.06.25 13:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any Issue or PR with the 1.0-blocker label. > > > > > > > > > > I guess we are ready to cut 1.0.0 right ? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 8:12 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > >> +1 on documenting on the site, which I don't think it's a 1.0 > > > blocker. It's > > > > >> been added into the release notes[1]. > > > > >> > > > > >> [1]. > > > > >> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JDVdQraoEhOIv7agy7WzIuBQdW0_16jW-DBrnanuW7A/edit?tab=t.0 > > > > >> > > > > >> Yufei > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:08 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > > > di...@apache.org> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Thanks for the heads up, Prashant! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I agree that it was a good idea to pull Compaction Rollback into > > 1.0. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Do we want to document this feature, or just mention it in > release > > > notes? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > >>> Dmitri. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Prashant Singh > > > > >>> <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Hey folks, > > > > >>>> I want to thank the whole community for jumping in for the > reviews > > > of > > > > >>>> Rollback Compaction on conflicts feature here > > > > >>>> < > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/793cf086f1f784c36296b1ea75298a08ce608ef2 > > > > >>>> . > > > > >>>> I am happy to share that it has now merged, since the 1.0 boat > has > > > not > > > > >>>> sailed, I cherry-picked the feature to 1.0, it's a clean > > > cherry-pick ! > > > > >>>> I believe it will strongly help in Apache Polaris adoption, and > > > > >>>> sincerely thank everyone who participated ! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Best, > > > > >>>> Prashant Singh > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:13 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > > > di...@apache.org> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Hi All, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Posting here for visibility: > > > > >>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z30f3cfvm41hxlbxgp4fqdpv7mfgnv8 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I opened that discussion thread about the new Spark Client > > plugin. > > > My > > > > >>>>> concern is that the linked > > > > >>>>> PR looks like it may require changing out approach to how we > > > publish > > > > >>>> Maven > > > > >>>>> artifacts > > > > >>>>> for that client.... Therefore, I'd like to have some more > clarity > > > on > > > > >>> that > > > > >>>>> issue in order to prevent > > > > >>>>> suddenly changing Maven coordinates right after the 1.0 > release. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Let's use the other thread for technical discussions. This > > message > > > is > > > > >>>> only > > > > >>>>> to flag potential > > > > >>>>> 1.0 impact. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>> Dmitri. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:13 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The rename commits( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/ab228afa4d975faabb7aaf1e8abb0804f5b9d353 > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/fccc51ab111b7ee1a0d3c8898e94b0c54bc73d80 > > > > >>>>>> ) > > > > >>>>>> have been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Yufei > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM Yufei Gu < > flyrain...@gmail.com> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> We could re-branch, but folks mentioned there are a few > Python > > > > >>>>>>> commits(like https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1810) we > > are > > > > >>> not > > > > >>>>>>> comfortable with having them in 1.0 branch. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Feel free to bring up a discussion for more PRs you think > it's > > > 1.0 > > > > >>>>>>> blockers and needed in 1.0. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Yufei > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > > > > >>>> di...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Yufei, > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> As discussed before, I think it is preferable to do the > > renames > > > > >>> in / > > > > >>>>>>>> before > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.0 because module names affect published Maven artifact > > names. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x from > `main`? > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>> Dmitri. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu < > > flyrain...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need > > > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695 > > > > >>>>>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if it's ready, > > but > > > > >>> I'm > > > > >>>>> OK > > > > >>>>>>>> with > > > > >>>>>>>>> either way. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Yufei > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu < > > flyrain...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 was > resolved > > by > > > > >>>>>> #1830, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are cherry-picked > > to > > > > >>>> 1.0 > > > > >>>>>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>>>>> already. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 was just > > > > >>> resolved > > > > >>>>> by > > > > >>>>>>>>> #1889, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Yufei > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > > > > >>>>>>>> di...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yufei, et al. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got merged > > > > >>>> recently... > > > > >>>>>> WDYT > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> about > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after addressing > > the > > > > >>>>>>>> remaining > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Dmitri. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu < > > > > >>> flyrain...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, > and > > > > >>> I > > > > >>>>>>>> believe > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it's > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release > > > > >>> ASAP. > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks > > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few > > > > >>> remaining > > > > >>>>>>>> blockers > > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need to resolve. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting > for > > > > >>>> the > > > > >>>>>> 1.0 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> next Monday at 9 AM PST. At the same time, sharing all > > > > >>>> issues > > > > >>>>>>>> marked > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. > Feel > > > > >>>> free > > > > >>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>> chime > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, > or > > > > >>>> pick > > > > >>>>>> any > > > > >>>>>>>>> up. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance! > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the list: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Add CI for Python code ( > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058 > > > > >>>> #1058), > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Task handling is incomplete (#774) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Generated files in > regtests/client/python/polaris > > > > >>>>> (#755) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Resources not properly closed, resource & > memory > > > > >>>> leaks > > > > >>>>>>>> (#563) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable > > > > >>>> locations > > > > >>>>>>>> (#552) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not > > > > >>> happen > > > > >>>>>> (#544) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the > > > > >>>> google > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> spreadsheet here: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yufei > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >
