Thanks ! It looks good to me. Regards JB
Le jeu. 19 juin 2025 à 00:12, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> a écrit : > The rename commits( > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/ab228afa4d975faabb7aaf1e8abb0804f5b9d353 > and > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/fccc51ab111b7ee1a0d3c8898e94b0c54bc73d80 > ) > have been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We could re-branch, but folks mentioned there are a few Python > > commits(like https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1810) we are not > > comfortable with having them in 1.0 branch. > > > > Feel free to bring up a discussion for more PRs you think it's 1.0 > > blockers and needed in 1.0. > > > > Yufei > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Yufei, > >> > >> As discussed before, I think it is preferable to do the renames in / > >> before > >> 1.0 because module names affect published Maven artifact names. > >> > >> For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x from `main`? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dmitri. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need > >> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695 > >> > in > >> > 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if it's ready, but I'm OK > >> with > >> > either way. > >> > > >> > Yufei > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 was resolved by > #1830, > >> > > #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are cherry-picked to 1.0 > >> branch > >> > > already. > >> > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 was just resolved by > >> > #1889, > >> > > which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. > >> > > > >> > > Yufei > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > >> di...@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Yufei, et al. > >> > >> > >> > >> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain: > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 > >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 > >> > >> > >> > >> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it? > >> > >> > >> > >> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got merged recently... > WDYT > >> > >> about > >> > >> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after addressing the > >> remaining > >> > >> issues? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Dmitri. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi folks, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and I > >> believe > >> > >> it's > >> > >> > critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release ASAP. > >> Thanks > >> > to > >> > >> the > >> > >> > community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few remaining > >> blockers > >> > we > >> > >> > need to resolve. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for the > 1.0 > >> > >> release > >> > >> > next Monday at 9 AM PST. At the same time, sharing all issues > >> marked > >> > >> with > >> > >> > 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel free to > >> > chime > >> > >> in, > >> > >> > remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or pick > any > >> > up. > >> > >> > Thanks a lot in advance! > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Here is the list: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Add CI for Python code ( > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058>#1058), > >> > >> > - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777> > >> > >> > - Task handling is incomplete (#774) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774> > >> > >> > - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris (#755) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755> > >> > >> > - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory leaks > >> (#563) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563> > >> > >> > - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable locations > >> (#552) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552> > >> > >> > - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not happen > (#544) > >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the google > >> > >> > spreadsheet here: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Yufei > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
