The rename commits( https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/ab228afa4d975faabb7aaf1e8abb0804f5b9d353 and https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/fccc51ab111b7ee1a0d3c8898e94b0c54bc73d80) have been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch.
Yufei On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > We could re-branch, but folks mentioned there are a few Python > commits(like https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1810) we are not > comfortable with having them in 1.0 branch. > > Feel free to bring up a discussion for more PRs you think it's 1.0 > blockers and needed in 1.0. > > Yufei > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Yufei, >> >> As discussed before, I think it is preferable to do the renames in / >> before >> 1.0 because module names affect published Maven artifact names. >> >> For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x from `main`? >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitri. >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need >> https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695 >> > in >> > 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if it's ready, but I'm OK >> with >> > either way. >> > >> > Yufei >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 was resolved by #1830, >> > > #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are cherry-picked to 1.0 >> branch >> > > already. >> > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 was just resolved by >> > #1889, >> > > which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch. >> > > >> > > Yufei >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < >> di...@apache.org> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Yufei, et al. >> > >> >> > >> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain: >> > >> >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 >> > >> >> > >> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it? >> > >> >> > >> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got merged recently... WDYT >> > >> about >> > >> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after addressing the >> remaining >> > >> issues? >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Dmitri. >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > >> > >> > Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and I >> believe >> > >> it's >> > >> > critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release ASAP. >> Thanks >> > to >> > >> the >> > >> > community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few remaining >> blockers >> > we >> > >> > need to resolve. >> > >> > >> > >> > To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for the 1.0 >> > >> release >> > >> > next Monday at 9 AM PST. At the same time, sharing all issues >> marked >> > >> with >> > >> > 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel free to >> > chime >> > >> in, >> > >> > remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or pick any >> > up. >> > >> > Thanks a lot in advance! >> > >> > >> > >> > Here is the list: >> > >> > >> > >> > - Add CI for Python code ( >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058>#1058), >> > >> > - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777> >> > >> > - Task handling is incomplete (#774) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774> >> > >> > - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris (#755) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755> >> > >> > - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory leaks >> (#563) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563> >> > >> > - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable locations >> (#552) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552> >> > >> > - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not happen (#544) >> > >> > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544> >> > >> > >> > >> > To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the google >> > >> > spreadsheet here: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing >> > >> > >> > >> > Yufei >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
