Hi Yufei,

As discussed before, I think it is preferable to do the renames in / before
1.0 because module names affect published Maven artifact names.

For that matter, why not re-branch release/1.0.x from `main`?

Thanks,
Dmitri.

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi JB and Dmitri, do we need https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1695
> in
> 1.0? We used to agree on bringing it to 1.0 if it's ready, but I'm OK with
> either way.
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:31 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616 was resolved by #1830,
> > #1834 and #1839. And these three commits are cherry-picked to 1.0 branch
> > already.
> > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881 was just resolved by
> #1889,
> > which has been cherry-picked to 1.0 branch.
> >
> > Yufei
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Yufei, et al.
> >>
> >> It looks like only two 1.0 blockers remain:
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1616
> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1881
> >>
> >> Re: [1] is anybody actively working on it?
> >>
> >> Also, I believe a lot of relevant changes got merged recently... WDYT
> >> about
> >> re-branching `release/1.0.x` from `main` after addressing the remaining
> >> issues?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Dmitri.
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > Many users have been asking about the Polaris release, and I believe
> >> it's
> >> > critical to have a formal, production-ready 1.0 release ASAP. Thanks
> to
> >> the
> >> > community’s hard work, we’re very close with a few remaining blockers
> we
> >> > need to resolve.
> >> >
> >> > To keep things moving, I scheduled a community meeting for the 1.0
> >> release
> >> > next Monday at 9 AM PST.  At the same time, sharing all issues marked
> >> with
> >> > 1.0 blocker. We could resolve them here if possible. Feel free to
> chime
> >> in,
> >> > remove the blocker tag if you think it's not a blocker, or pick any
> up.
> >> > Thanks a lot in advance!
> >> >
> >> > Here is the list:
> >> >
> >> >    - Add CI for Python code (
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1058>#1058),
> >> >       - Polaris persistence concurrency issues (#777)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777>
> >> >       - Task handling is incomplete (#774)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/774>
> >> >       - Generated files in regtests/client/python/polaris (#755)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/755>
> >> >       - Resources not properly closed, resource & memory leaks (#563)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/563>
> >> >       - Make Polaris safe against certain unparseable locations (#552)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/552>
> >> >       - [BUG] Assumption that cache eviction does not happen (#544)
> >> >       <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/544>
> >> >
> >> > To make it more interactive, you can also comment on the google
> >> > spreadsheet here:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyLvp2cdYwioOsBwszNWiphZt_IIdo4LIfsZBFV88mc/edit?usp=sharing
> >> >
> >> > Yufei
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to