+1. 15 days can be too long and and especially the new contributors would feel more stalled. As long as the reviewer's comments are addressed and there is at least 1 binding +1, it should be totally fine to go ahead.
Thanks, Dinesh On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:30 AM Neil Joshi <neil...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 7:36 PM Hui Fei <feihui.u...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla <umamah...@apache.org> 于2023年2月1日周三 > 06:51写道： > > > > > Dear Ozone Devs, > > > > > > This has been brought up by Ritesh in community sync. I thought we > could > > > discuss this more broadly and set up some path forwarding options. > > > > > > With my past experience, when a reviewer does not respond for a long > time > > > and if another reviewer helped to review, we will just give a few days' > > > wait for the old reviewer to confirm his comments. If no further > > responses > > > from the old reviewer, we used to move ahead. > > > > > > I think we can follow the similar approach: > > > > > > When the reviewer does not respond for a long time (say 15days? ): > > > The Author can freely ping other reviewers to help if no one else > > > reviewed it yet. > > > If the other reviewer is a committer and got +1 from him, then we > can > > > give a 3-7days time window for the old reviewer to check as a final > > > friendly reminder. If still no responses, then we can just move ahead > for > > > commit based new committer reviewer's +1. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Uma > > > > > > > > -- > NJ >
