15 days is too long. We shouldn't hold up progress for weeks waiting for a reviewer to come back.
If the original reviewer’s comments were addressed, I see no harm in moving forward with a binding +1 from another reviewer. The exception is a binding veto. > On Jan 31, 2023, at 2:50 PM, Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla > <umamah...@apache.org> wrote: > > Dear Ozone Devs, > > This has been brought up by Ritesh in community sync. I thought we could > discuss this more broadly and set up some path forwarding options. > > With my past experience, when a reviewer does not respond for a long time > and if another reviewer helped to review, we will just give a few days' > wait for the old reviewer to confirm his comments. If no further responses > from the old reviewer, we used to move ahead. > > I think we can follow the similar approach: > > When the reviewer does not respond for a long time (say 15days? ): > The Author can freely ping other reviewers to help if no one else > reviewed it yet. > If the other reviewer is a committer and got +1 from him, then we can > give a 3-7days time window for the old reviewer to check as a final > friendly reminder. If still no responses, then we can just move ahead for > commit based new committer reviewer's +1. > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Uma --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org