15 days is too long. We shouldn't hold up progress for weeks waiting for a 
reviewer to come back.

If the original reviewer’s comments were addressed, I see no harm in moving 
forward with a binding +1 from another reviewer. The exception is a binding 
veto.


> On Jan 31, 2023, at 2:50 PM, Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla 
> <umamah...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Ozone Devs,
> 
> This has been brought up by Ritesh in community sync. I thought we could
> discuss this more broadly and set up some path forwarding options.
> 
> With my past experience, when a reviewer does not respond for a long time
> and if another reviewer helped to review, we will just give a few days'
> wait for the old reviewer to confirm his comments. If no further responses
> from the old reviewer, we used to move ahead.
> 
> I think we can follow the similar approach:
> 
> When the reviewer does not respond for a long time (say 15days? ):
>    The Author can freely ping other reviewers to help if no one else
> reviewed it yet.
>    If the other reviewer is a committer and got +1 from him, then we can
> give a 3-7days time window for the old reviewer to check as a final
> friendly reminder. If still no responses, then we can just move ahead for
> commit based new committer reviewer's +1.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Regards,
> Uma


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org

Reply via email to