Thank you all for the suggestions and feedback. The SCM HA wiki is set up
here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/SCM+HA as suggested
and all the design docs, steps for  setting up SCM HA cluster and upgrade
to SCM HA cluster , performance data as well as the merge checklist info
has been put up there.  Any inputs/suggestions/feedbacks regarding the wiki
are welcome.

Thanks
Shashi

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:55 PM Siddharth Wagle <swa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:

> @Arpit: we discussed the checklist in the last community meeting. These are
> meant to be guidelines for feature developers to self-assess, it should not
> be a roadblock, IMO.
>
> Most of the items are probably easy to check off the list.
>
> @Marton: A discussion thread would be helpful to refine the page. For
> example: feature dev does not know how to get the Sonar numbers on the
> feature branch, this should be linked from the comments section on the
> wiki.
>
> - Sid
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:41 AM Elek, Marton <e...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Were these guidelines voted and agreed upon by the community?
> > >
> >
> > Thanks the question Arpit.
> >
> > Unfortunately I am not sure If I understand it well.
> >
> > 1. Based on direct meaning you are asking about where the Ozone VOTEs
> > can be found.
> >
> > They are always part of the mailing list traffic and archive can be
> > found on https://lists.apache.org/
> >
> > There was no VOTE related to how merging any branches.
> >
> > 2. As I am almost sure that you know it, it can be a suggestion, but I
> > would like to ask to clarify it.
> >
> > As far as I see merges are voted by individuals and we couldn't VOTE on
> > binding rules how the votes should be cast.
> >
> > But let me know if you have some suggestions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The checklist is discussed on the community sync and a mail also sent to
> > the mailing list. Based on the feedback it can be helpful. It seems that
> > we all interested about maintaining the stability. I think identifying
> > possible problems can help us to avoid them in advance.
> >
> >
> > The only one risk what I see that the merge would be delayed with
> > significant time due to the stabilization/documentation work. To avoid
> > it here I offer my help and full support to keep both agility and
> > stability. Especially about the build and containerization related
> > stuff, but also happy to write down documentation if somebody can help
> > with explaining a few questions.
> >
> > Also happy to test it in containerized environment. Until now it helped
> > a lot as different deployment model helped us to find different
> > problems, but which were _generic_ to any of the deployment model.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 4:20 AM Elek, Marton <e...@apache.org <mailto:
> > e...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > Thanks to start the discussion Shashikant,
> > >
> > > Good to see that SCM HA is close to the merge.
> > >
> > > I like Attila's suggestion:
> > >
> > > +1 to check stability based on the checklist and create a wiki page.
> > >
> > > And +1 the merge after we have passed all the items (as we will have
> > > enough information to believe that master stability will be fine).
> > >
> > > Marton
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/9/21 11:30 AM, Attila Doroszlai wrote:
> > >> Thanks Shashikant for starting the discussion.
> > >>
> > >> Marton has recently proposed a solid checklist to go through before
> > >> branch merge:
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Merging+branches <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Merging+branches>
> > >> One of the items is basic documentation as suggested by Xiaoyu.
> > >>
> > >> It would be great if we could get a clear status of the SCM HA branch
> > >> by going through the checklist and providing answers/information about
> > >> each point (where applicable).  I suggest writing it up as a wiki
> > >> page: various items may be addressed by different people, plus if some
> > >> area needs improvement, we could track the changes without spamming
> > >> the list.
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >> Attila
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-h...@ozone.apache.org>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-h...@ozone.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to